ComETS Members
Resources for ComETS members
[http://carat.umich.edu/carat/files/wisconsinminstructor.pdf Carl Berger's Presentation] Read more »
Group 7 - Lillian Tong
Public
'''Build a relationship: Helpful, Knowledgeable, Trusted'''
*It's easier if you are part of department to build a relationship with individuals and know what they are trying. Read more »
Group 2 - Paul Gunther
Public
Definition of a MI: TA? Grad Student?
Doug reports that several productive collaborations are with graduate students
High Tech needs may not mean that the user is a MI Read more »
= Overview = Read more »
Group 6 - Jeff Bohrer
Public
Characteristics of MI
*Exploration - need to experiment and be autonomous
*central/common solutions are not necessarily desired
*Use of new technologies
Changing role of instructional support Read more »
Final Session Notes
Public
Pre-reports: Thought that we had examples in our minds of MIs, but realized we might be confusing them with instructors who just use technology. Read more »
Group 1 - Cheryl Diermyer
Public
Carl Berger breakout question/discussion
Breakout group #1
Group 1) The Millennial Instructor, a closer look Read more »
Group 3 - Lisa Jansen
Public
MI examples
Nelly Hausen, Tom Armbrecht, Michael Shield
How do approaches differ?
What are some of the traits of instructors that were identified
*New tech is risky
*Willing to take risk Read more »
Group 4 - Catherine Stephens
Public
Theme Four breakout Notes What is a millennial instructor? Each person took a turn to describe a faculty/instructor who we thought of as a "digital native" or millennial instructor. Young, middle age, senior faculty. Self-taught, grounded in expertise, learning from colleagues, wives, friends. Using tools like podcasts, wikis, digital imaging, sims and games. Read more »
Group 5 - Sarah McDaniel
Public
*Millennial examples:
** Try something and drop it if it doesn
